From the soil (’ădāmāh) God creates a "living being" called ’ādām ("humanity / of earth")
who can't find a suitable partner. Of several comic moments, the first might be the aftermath of God's otherwise poignant sympathy for Adam's loneliness: God creates Land animals and presents them to Adam as potential companions. This isn't just bawdy, archaic barnyard humor: it prefigures a major theme of the story. Will humans accept the snake's invitation to obey their impulsive desires? Like animals? Or will they accept God's invitation to maintain their garden and Being by accepting limits on base instincts? A choice is presented between a balanced relationship with God, each other and their world… or autonomous self-creation.
We are not surprised to hear, after being presented these bestial options, that “there was not found a helper" for Adam. And when God finally gets around to creating Eve from Adam’s rib, Adam seems to express a certain irritation. Why had it taken God so long to work it out? “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh" – that's Hebrew humor from three millennia ago, ribbing God. But the text still refers to Adam as ’ādām when he announces "This is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called isha ("woman") because she came from ish ("man"). This statement is the first time Adam's identity switches from ’ādām to ish. Names and identity are crucial components of biblical cosmology. The two are not the same: ish refers to man as opposite of woman, or as man distinguished in his manliness. ’Ādām refers to a whole and corporate "humanity" as the pinnacle of creation, in relationship to and image of God.▼ For this reason his statement is mistaken: woman did not come from man, but from ’ādām. And both came ultimately from God. Adam, in his ishness and excitement, pridefully claims the woman came from him as he now understands himself: a new, uniquely differentiated identity. In this moment he forgets God as the true source of his original wholeness. Eve will make a similarly self-congratulatory statement at the birth of Cain.
▲ image of God The statement about the image of God (vv. 26–27) must be understood in juxtaposition to Israel’s resistance to manufacturing any image of God (cf. Exod. 20:4; Deut. 5:8). Because of the temptation of Babylonian religion during the Exile (the time of Genesis's final editing), Israel resisted every notion that things in the world resembled God. Israel was at pains to affirm the otherness and transcendence of God (cf. Isa. 40:17–26). Genesis was concerned with showing God and Israel to be free from the world. It was the freedom of God which gave exiles hope against the massive power of the empires around them. Therefore, God was not to be seen as imaged in any of them. (Cf. Deut. 4:15–18, in which imaging is linked to creation.) Within that critique of every religious temptation to idolatry, the text makes the counter-assertion that there is only one way in which God is imaged in the world: humanness.
She is extracted, strangely, from Adam – a surprising reversal if viewed biologically – as her name means she is the "mother of all living" (Eve="Ḥawwāh," meaning “giver of life”). Why this might be the case could be inferred from the context: Adam is sleeping. Eve is derived from the unconscious Adam (Genesis 2:21). This is key to understanding part of her role in creation. Adam, as microcosmic image of God, has just been charged to parallel the divine creative ordering by likewise dividing up all the animals into categories of names. This can only be accomplished by a conscious and differentiating mind. Eve was created from the unconscious Adam, and for this reason it has been said that she draws attention to what he has not named – what is not yet known to Adam, what has not yet been brought to consciousness. It begs the question: Why doesn't Adam give this woman a name until after "the Fall"? Maybe she had to remind him.
Eve’s role as “helper,” derives from a word that has been misogynistically misinterpreted for centuries. The Hebrew phrase is ezer kenegdo and throughout the biblical texts it is in fact applied to God, denoting his provision of potent assistance – and not in a subordinate capacity: “Our soul waiteth for the Lord: He is our ezer (“help”) and our shield” (Psalms 33:20). Psalms 115:9–11, 121:1–2, and 124:8 add to this portrayal, depicting God in this ezer role, not only as a source of aid, but of strength. The word ezer connotes active intervention on behalf of someone, especially in military contexts, as often in Psalms and Ezekiel 12:14. It suggests rescue, strength, and strategic advantage. The word kenegdo adds to it the descriptor that together can be rendered "counterbalancing ally" or "one who corresponds in beneficial opposition." It might be most useful to consider Eve something approximating a beneficial check and balance—a partner in play.
It is to bring about mutual improvement that Eve is created, in a state of fundamental equality and partnership—and in particular, created from Adam’s rib. The original Hebrew text uses the word tzela (עָלֵצ, a term whose primary meaning throughout the Hebrew Bible is not "rib" but "side." The word is used dozens of times to refer to the side of a building, such as the Tabernacle or an altar. In Sumerian – an occasional source of loanwords for the Genesis author – it is a pun that means both "rib" and “life”). Eve is created not from his head (as Athena sprang from Zeus, which might imply a potential superiority) and not from his leg, foot, or other lower bodily part (which would imply subordination or inferiority). Eve corresponds to Adam precisely as the Taoist yin does to yang. As such, part of her role is to bring to her partner’s attention all the concerns that he may have overlooked, involved as he is in the potentially near-sighted business of naming all the animals.
Loneliness is the only thing God declares "not good. This existential problem’s early mention here in Gen 2:18 prefigures its increase in Exile. When God sees that Adam is alone, Eve is the solution to this unique problem. But she is unique for other reasons as well. Eve is created from the first living being, not from the dust as Adam was – and is the only being created directly from the living tissue of another. After her arrival God no longer creates alone; from this point forward, God works in partnership with humanity to bring about new life and fulfill creation’s purpose. Taken together, this strongly implies that the story is designed to show unity and mutual need, not hierarchy. The order of creation (Adam first, then Eve) does not imply subordination – and it could just as easily be argued the other direction. When the J and P sources are combined in chronological order it can be seen that it is only after the creation of Eve that God pronounces the final “very good."
In Genesis, human beings start off in a garden. In Revelation, they end up in a city. And in Genesis, creation progresses from good to very good. Reading the story tragically has led some people to interpret Eve as second and therefore worse, but the scriptures are narratively progressive. It is only by a denial of the divine comedy – the Bible's upwardly structured trajectory – that results in assuming whatever comes later is worse. Even after the Fall the term "’ādām" – as earth-based in etymology as earth-blessed in origin – still is used for humanity: not Adam's pridefully self-distinguishing ish man or isha woman. The image of God is still the central distinction, despite the disrupted communion. Eve arrives on the scene to find Adam rejoicing – "finally!" – no longer lonely, so they can together participate in divinely ordained eros and continue creation. The children are the glory of their parents, and what permeates the scriptures from this point on is the feeling of things moving towards something that should be better – even if they're getting worse. The movement is further up and further into the complicated world of choices and consequences of consciousness.